OMAR RICARDO BROWN v. LARS SEVERSON, etc.
This text of OMAR RICARDO BROWN v. LARS SEVERSON, etc. (OMAR RICARDO BROWN v. LARS SEVERSON, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 3, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1794 Lower Tribunal No. 21-548-K ________________
Omar Ricardo Brown, Appellant,
vs.
Lars Severson, etc., et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig, Judge.
Omar Ricardo Brown, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, State of Florida.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and MILLER and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brown v. State, 302 So. 3d 874, 874 (Fla. 3d DCA
2020); Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992) (“Habeas corpus
is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues
which could have been, should have been, or were raised on direct appeal.”);
Jackson v. State, 1 So. 3d 273, 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“Even when a
Fourth Amendment violation has occurred, evidence should be suppressed
only if it ‘has been come at by exploitation of the illegality’ and was not
obtained ‘by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary
taint.’” (quoting Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488 (1963))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
OMAR RICARDO BROWN v. LARS SEVERSON, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omar-ricardo-brown-v-lars-severson-etc-fladistctapp-2022.