Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny
This text of Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny (Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00300-CV
OMAR MARTINEZ APPELLANT
V.
NORA MATHENY APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On October 22, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk
responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that
payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as
required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.
35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s
record and provided this court with proof of payment.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s
record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want
of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: November 14, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omar-martinez-v-nora-matheny-texapp-2013.