Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 2013·No. 02-13-00300-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00300-CV

OMAR MARTINEZ APPELLANT

V.

NORA MATHENY APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On October 22, 2013, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that

payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 14, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny (Omar Martinez v. Nora Matheny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.