Omar Jones v. State
This text of Omar Jones v. State (Omar Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ January 20, 2021
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A21A0518. OMAR JONES v. THE STATE.
Omar Jones pleaded guilty to armed robbery and other charges in February 2018. In August 2019, Jones filed two pro se motions – a “Motion for State to Turn Over Name and Badge Number of Sworn Grand Jury Bailiff Who Handled Above Indictment” (“motion to disclose”) and a motion to correct a void sentence. In October 2019, the trial court entered a single order denying both motions. In November 2019, Jones filed an application for discretionary review of the order in this court and a direct appeal of the same order. We dismissed Jones’s application for discretionary review for lack jurisdiction. See A20D0176 (dismissed Dec. 9, 2019). We lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal. It is well settled that the denial of an application for discretionary appeal constitutes a decision on the merits. See Elrod v. Sunflower Meadows Dev., LLC, 322 Ga. App. 666, 670 (4) (745 SE2d 846) (2013) (“[W]hen this Court examines a request for a discretionary appeal, it acts in an error-correcting mode such that a denial of the application is on the merits, and the order denying the application is res judicata with respect to the substance of the requested review.”) (punctuation omitted). Thus, the doctrine of res judicata bars this direct appeal from the same order. See Northwest Social & Civic Club v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). Based on the foregoing, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and this direct appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/20/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Omar Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omar-jones-v-state-gactapp-2021.