Omar Epps v. N. Grannis

470 F. App'x 553
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 29, 2012
Docket11-56589
StatusUnpublished

This text of 470 F. App'x 553 (Omar Epps v. N. Grannis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Omar Epps v. N. Grannis, 470 F. App'x 553 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Omar Ernest Epps appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against several prison official defendant-appellees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir.2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir.1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omar-epps-v-n-grannis-ca9-2012.