Omar Cuevas, Elizabeth Cuevas, and Hoc Properties, Inc. v. Wheat Investments, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 5, 2012
Docket13-11-00140-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Omar Cuevas, Elizabeth Cuevas, and Hoc Properties, Inc. v. Wheat Investments, Inc. (Omar Cuevas, Elizabeth Cuevas, and Hoc Properties, Inc. v. Wheat Investments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Omar Cuevas, Elizabeth Cuevas, and Hoc Properties, Inc. v. Wheat Investments, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00140-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

OMAR CUEVAS, ELIZABETH CUEVAS, APPELLANTS, AND HOC PROPERTIES, INC.,

v.

WHEAT INVESTMENTS, INC., APPELLEE. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Omar Cuevas, Elizabeth Cuevas and HOC Properties, Inc.,

perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo

County, Texas, in cause number CL-10-3099-D. On January 12, 2012, the appeal was

abated because the reporter’s record was lost. This appeal is hereby REINSTATED. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that

the parties have reached an agreement which renders this appeal moot. Appellants

request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 5th day of April, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Omar Cuevas, Elizabeth Cuevas, and Hoc Properties, Inc. v. Wheat Investments, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omar-cuevas-elizabeth-cuevas-and-hoc-properties-in-texapp-2012.