OMAR BAILEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of OMAR BAILEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (OMAR BAILEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
OMAR BAILEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D20-2677
[June 10, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-005351CF10A.
Susanne K. Sichta and Richard A. Sichta of The Sichta Firm, LLC, Jacksonville, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
OMAR BAILEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omar-bailey-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.