O'Malley v. Times Pub. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

O'Malley v. Times Pub. Co.

140 F. 990, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4587

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 27, 1906

DocketNo. 24

StatusPublished

This text of 140 F. 990 (O'Malley v. Times Pub. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Malley v. Times Pub. Co., 140 F. 990, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4587 (circtedpa 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLLAND, District Judge.

For the reasons given in the case of Wright v. Copper Company, 206 Pa. 274, 55 Atl. 978, a case in which the facts are the same as the one in hand, the rule on defendants to show cause why the record in this case should not be amended, and the name of “The Times Publishing Company” be made to read “The Philadelphia Times Company,” is made absolute, and the plaintiff required to file the amendment within 10 days from this date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLLAND, District Judge.

For the reasons given in the case of Wright v. Copper Company, 206 Pa. 274, 55 Atl. 978, a case in which the facts are the same as the one in hand, the rule on defendants to show cause why the record in this case should not be amended, and the name of “The Times Publishing Company” be made to read “The Philadelphia Times Company,” is made absolute, and the plaintiff required to file the amendment within 10 days from this date.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 F. 990, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omalley-v-times-pub-co-circtedpa-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack