O'Malley v. O'Malley

78 N.W. 753, 102 Wis. 639, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 80
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided April 4, 1899·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Dodge, J.

No discussion of the evidence can be useful in this case. There is abundant support for the findings that the deceased, in 1875, executed and delivered to the respondent the deed in question, which was promptly recorded. None of the debts’ now existing against the estate were in existence or in contemplation at that time, nor, indeed, for many years afterward. There can be no right in the administrator, under sec. 3832, Stats. 1898, to attack such conveyance except for intent to defraud the existing creditors, who alone are represented by him. It is wholly immaterial Avhether that deed was made upon sufficient, or any, consideration, or with intent to defraud the holder of some debt existing in 1875. Judgment was properly entered in favor of the defendant, and should be affirmed.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Malley v. O'Malley, 78 N.W. 753, 102 Wis. 639, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 80 (Wis. 1899).

78 N.W. 753 (O'Malley v. O'Malley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Evans
1944 OK 5 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1944)
Neelen v. Holzhauer
214 N.W. 497 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1927)
Ecklor v. Wolcott
90 N.W. 1081 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)