O'Malley Cooperage, Inc. v. Laubentracht

125 Misc. 850, 211 N.Y.S. 508, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1132
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 25, 1924·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam:

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Both plaintiff and defendant having moved for the direction " of a verdict upon the complaint and counterclaim, all questions of law and fact were left to the court.

Defendant did not waive his right to go to the jury after the court granted plaintiff’s motion, since, after the court had granted the plaintiff’s motion, defendant moved to go to the jury. The motion to go to the jury was made in time. Its effectiveness was not impaired by a failure to specify the particular question to be submitted to the jury. (Brown Paint Co. v. Reinhardt, 210 N. Y. 162.)

Present: Cropsey, Lazansky and MacCrate, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Malley Cooperage, Inc. v. Laubentracht, 125 Misc. 850, 211 N.Y.S. 508, 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

125 Misc. 850 (O'Malley Cooperage, Inc. v. Laubentracht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charles H. Brown Paint Co. v. Reinhardt
104 N.E. 124 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)