Omair v. Bilgeo Realty Corp.
This text of 309 A.D.2d 841 (Omair v. Bilgeo Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), entered April 30, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them, dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly restricted the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert (see Novikova v Greenbriar Owners Corp., 258 AD2d 149 [1999]).
The plaintiffs remaining contention does not require reversal. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 A.D.2d 841, 766 N.Y.S.2d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omair-v-bilgeo-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2003.