Omair v. Bilgeo Realty Corp.

309 A.D.2d 841, 766 N.Y.S.2d 53

This text of 309 A.D.2d 841 (Omair v. Bilgeo Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Omair v. Bilgeo Realty Corp., 309 A.D.2d 841, 766 N.Y.S.2d 53 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), entered April 30, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly restricted the testimony of the plaintiffs’ expert (see Novikova v Greenbriar Owners Corp., 258 AD2d 149 [1999]).

The plaintiffs remaining contention does not require reversal. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
258 A.D.2d 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 A.D.2d 841, 766 N.Y.S.2d 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omair-v-bilgeo-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2003.