Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, a Corporation v. Village of Walthill, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation

460 F.2d 1327, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9212
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 1972
Docket72-1002
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 1327 (Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, a Corporation v. Village of Walthill, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, a Corporation v. Village of Walthill, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation, 460 F.2d 1327, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9212 (8th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

*1328 PER CURIAM.

This controversy is between the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska,, the Tribal Council of the Omaha Tribe and certain officers and members of the Council, as plaintiffs-appellees, and the Village of Walthill, Nebraska, Thurston County, Nebraska, the State of Nebraska, and certain village, county, and state officers, as defendants-appellants.

The dispute centers on the question of jurisdiction over crimes committed by or against Indians on the Omaha Reservation. Seeking a resolution of the problem, plaintiffs filed this action in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. They sought a declaration that exclusive jurisdiction over crimes committed by or against Indians is in the United States Government and the Omaha Tribe through the Federal Government, except as to offenses involving the operation of motor vehicles on public roads or highways.

Motions for summary judgment were filed by plaintiffs and defendants. The district court, Judge Robinson, granted the plaintiffs’ motion and entered judgment accordingly. Defendants have brought the case here by appeal.

The controlling facts are fully detailed in the district court’s opinion reported at 334 F.Supp. 823 (D.Neb.1971). Reference to the legislative enactments and ensuing action by the authorities, which are the crucial aspects of this litigation will suffice for the purpose of this opinion. In 1953, the Congress of the United States, by appropriate legislation, provided that the State of Nebraska should have jurisdiction over civil causes of action and jurisdiction over offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations within the State of Nebraska to the same extent that the state had jurisdiction over other civil actions or criminal offenses. Nebraska assumed and exercised such jurisdiction. In 1968, Congress authorized the Federal Government to accept a retrocession by any state “. . . of all or any measure of the criminal or civil jurisdiction, or both, acquired by such state” (granted by 67 Stat. 588, 1953 Act). Acting pursuant to the 1968 enactment, the Nebraska Legislature adopted a resolution ceding to the Federal Government all of the criminal jurisdiction over offenses committed by or against Indians in Thurston County, except motor vehicle offenses. In October, 1970, the Secretary of Interior accepted the state’s - retrocession as to the Omaha Indian Reservation, but not the Winnebago Indian Reservation, also located in Thurston County, Nebraska. The partial acceptance of Indian reservations in Thurston County precipitated this controversy.

Concisely stated, defendants assert that under the 1968 Act authorizing retrocession, the Federal Government was obligated to accept all or none of the Indian country in Thurston County. They submit acceptance of only the Omaha Reservation was a nullity and consequently Nebraska retains jurisdiction over offenses committed on the Omaha Reservation. Conversely, plaintiffs vouch for the validity of the partial acceptance.

The district court fully explored every facet of the issue in a soundly reasoned opinion and convincingly demonstrated that the retrocession acceptance procedures comported with the 1968 Act and therefore exclusive jurisdiction over offenses committed on the Omaha Reservation is in the Federal Government.

We affirm on the basis of the opinion of Judge Robinson. See also United States v. Brown, 334 F.Supp. 536 (D. Neb.1971), where Judge Denney considered the identical issue and reached the same result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Washington v. Donald Joseph Gabriel Zack
413 P.3d 65 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2018)
Opinion No. (2002)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 2002
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Kelly
104 F.3d 1546 (Tenth Circuit, 1997)
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Kelly
932 F. Supp. 1284 (D. New Mexico, 1996)
Kickapoo Tribe of Indians v. Babbitt
827 F. Supp. 37 (District of Columbia, 1993)
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Finney
836 P.2d 1169 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1992)
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota
900 F.2d 1164 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
Dennis Tyndall v. Frank Gunter
840 F.2d 617 (Eighth Circuit, 1988)
Tyndall v. Gunter
681 F. Supp. 641 (D. Nebraska, 1987)
Opinion No. (1985)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1985
United States v. James Russell Lawrence
595 F.2d 1149 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Hoodie
441 F. Supp. 835 (D. Oregon, 1977)
Omaha Tribe of Indians v. William A. Peters
516 F.2d 133 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
Omaha Tribe of Indians v. Peters
382 F. Supp. 421 (D. Nebraska, 1974)
State v. Goham
216 N.W.2d 869 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 1327, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omaha-tribe-of-nebraska-a-corporation-v-village-of-walthill-nebraska-a-ca8-1972.