Omaha Baum Iron Store Co. v. Moline Plow Co.

244 U.S. 650, 37 S. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1371, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1690
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 11, 1917·No. No. 1029·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 37; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519; Union Trust Co. v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 519; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Omaha Baum Iron Store Co. v. Moline Plow Co., 244 U.S. 650, 37 S. Ct. 743, 61 L. Ed. 1371, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1690 (1917).

244 U.S. 650 (Omaha Baum Iron Store Co. v. Moline Plow Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alabama Public Service Commission v. Louisville &. N. R.
89 So. 524 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Fentress Coal & Coke Co. v. Elmore
249 U.S. 592 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Sims v. Stark
249 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Jacket v. United Thacker Coal Co.
248 U.S. 531 (Supreme Court, 1918)