Oma Roy Eidson v. United States

296 F.2d 736

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Oma Roy Eidson v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 272 F.2d 684 →

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 15, 1961·No. 6831_1·Published

Opinion

296 F.2d 736

Oma Roy EIDSON
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6831.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 15, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

Richard C. McLean, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion, on the ground that the questions raised are not open to review under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

296 F.2d 736

Oma Roy EIDSON
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6831.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

November 15, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

Richard C. McLean, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Lawrence M. Henry, U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion, on the ground that the questions raised are not open to review under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Oma Roy Eidson v. United States, 296 F.2d 736 (10th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

296 F.2d 736 (Oma Roy Eidson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.