Olympus Insurance Company v. Maikel Hernandez

171 So. 3d 831, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12472, 2015 WL 4936474
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 2015·No. 4D15-1060·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The trial court departed from the essential requirements of law when it granted the motion for substitution of party and denied the motion to dismiss based upon counsel’s unsworn assertions of excusable neglect. Steinhardt v. Intercondominium Grp. Inc., 771 So.2d 614, 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). The petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted, and the trial court’s February 19, 2015 order is quashed. On remand, the trial court is directed to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the untimely filing of the motion for substitution of party was caused by excusable neglect. Id. at 615.

STEVENSON and FORST, JJ„ concur. CONNER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olympus Insurance Company v. Maikel Hernandez, 171 So. 3d 831, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12472, 2015 WL 4936474 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

171 So. 3d 831 (Olympus Insurance Company v. Maikel Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mirna J. DeBlois, etc. v. Jose Dominguez
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023