Olympic Radio & Television, Inc. v. Andrews
279 A.D. 1081, 112 N.Y.S.2d 116, 30 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2166, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5904
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1952·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The complaint fails to allege that the membership authorized or ratified the acts committed by some of the union’s members and, therefore, it is insufficient against the union’s officers. (Martin v. Curran, 303 N. Y. 276.) For those reasons the injunction should not have been issued against the officers as such. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [See 280 App. Div. 806.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Olympic Radio & Television, Inc. v. Andrews, 279 A.D. 1081, 112 N.Y.S.2d 116, 30 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2166, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1081 (Olympic Radio & Television, Inc. v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Communications Workers of America District 1
131 A.D.3d 1087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Rochdale Village, Inc. v. Beverly
96 Misc. 2d 1080 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Nathan's Famous, Inc. v. Local. 1115
70 Misc. 2d 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)