Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Olympic Holding Co. v. ACE Ltd.

Olympic Holding Co. v. ACE Ltd.

885 N.E.2d 954, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1496
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 7, 2008
Docket2008-0200
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 885 N.E.2d 954 (Olympic Holding Co. v. ACE Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olympic Holding Co. v. ACE Ltd., 885 N.E.2d 954, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1496 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 07AP-168, 2007-Ohio-6643. Discretionary appeal accepted.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Motion for admission pro hac vice of Frederick R. Kessler and William A. Maher by Kathleen M. Trafford granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olympic Holding Co., L.L.C. v. ACE Ltd.
2009 Ohio 2057 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
885 N.E.2d 954, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olympic-holding-co-v-ace-ltd-ohio-2008.