Olympic Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision

903 F.2d 837, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 219, 1990 WL 76534
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 1990
DocketNos. 90-5085, 90-5086
StatusPublished

This text of 903 F.2d 837 (Olympic Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olympic Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision, 903 F.2d 837, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 219, 1990 WL 76534 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The court having issued an order on April 5, 1990 to show cause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed, and the parties having responded thereto on April 6, 1990, the court concludes that this appeal has been rendered moot by the nomination and confirmation of Timothy Ryan, Jr. as Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision.

In the order on appeal, the district court directed that

[n]either the Acting Director of OTS nor any other officer at OTS may appoint a receiver or conservator for Olympic until a new Director is constitutionally appointed.

Olympic Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision, et. al., 732 F.Supp. 1183 (D.D.C.1990) (order granting preliminary injunction). Because a new OTS Director has been constitutionally appointed, “the terms of the injunction ... have been fully and irrevocably carried out,” and no live issue remains for this court’s resolution. See University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 398, 101 S.Ct. 1830, 1835, 68 L.Ed.2d 175 (1980). Therefore, it is

ADJUDGED that the district court’s preliminary injunction lapses of its own terms, and ORDERED that this court’s order staying the effect of the preliminary injunction is vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that these appeals are dismissed as moot and these cases are remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the order to show cause is discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

University of Texas v. Camenisch
451 U.S. 390 (Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
903 F.2d 837, 284 U.S. App. D.C. 219, 1990 WL 76534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olympic-federal-savings-loan-assn-v-director-office-of-thrift-cadc-1990.