Olympian West Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kramer

427 So. 2d 1039
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1983
Docket82-1605
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 427 So. 2d 1039 (Olympian West Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olympian West Condominium Association, Inc. v. Kramer, 427 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

427 So.2d 1039 (1983)

OLYMPIAN WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant,
v.
Robert B. KRAMER, Jack Berger, Arnold Berger and Irving Berger, Appellees.

No. 82-1605.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 1, 1983.
Rehearing Denied March 30, 1983.

Schoninger, Jankowitz, Siegfried & Kipnis and Tom Hall, Miami, for appellant.

Kaplan, Jaffe & Gates and Howard Jaffe, Hollywood, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We agree with the trial court that the principals of the corporate developer-builder who serve, pursuant to the designation of the developer, as directors of the condominium association prior to the assumption of control by the unit owners, are not personally liable in that latter capacity to the association for the existence of, or the failure to correct construction defects in the condominium building which are allegedly created by the developer itself. See Section 718.303(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). The decisions relied upon by the association, Avila South Condominium Assoc., Inc. v. Kappa Corp., 347 So.2d 599 (Fla. 1977), which involved the disgorging of profits secured through self-dealing by the directors at the expense of the association, and B & J Holding Corp. v. Weiss, 353 So.2d 141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), in which the directors failed to comply with the duty to collect assessments imposed by the condominium law, Section 718.111(6), Florida Statutes (1981) are decisively distinguishable from this case, in which no cognizable breach of a common law, statutory, or contractual duty is alleged.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pearce III v. Sandler
219 So. 3d 961 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Sonny Boy, LLC v. Asnani
879 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Perlow v. Goldberg
700 So. 2d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Goodman v. Weinstein
638 So. 2d 627 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Munder v. Circle One Condominium, Inc.
596 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Glens Condominium, Inc. v. Radice Corp.
563 So. 2d 704 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Oceancrest Condominium Apartments, Inc. v. Donner
504 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Lakeview Townhomes v. East Fla. Develop.
454 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Harte v. Palm Beach Biltmore Condominium Ass'n
436 So. 2d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 So. 2d 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olympian-west-condominium-association-inc-v-kramer-fladistctapp-1983.