Olu S. v. New York City Commissioner of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Olu S. v. New York City Commissioner of Social Services

237 A.D.2d 294, 654 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 294 (Olu S. v. New York City Commissioner of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olu S. v. New York City Commissioner of Social Services, 237 A.D.2d 294, 654 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated February 9, 1995, which transferred the proceeding to the Family Court, Queens County.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The present appeal is not authorized by the governing statute (see, CPLR 7011; People ex rel. Tatra v McNeill, 19 AD2d 845). In a habeas corpus proceeding, no appeal lies from an intermediate order (see, Matter of Wilkes v Wilkes, 212 AD2d 719 [and cases cited therein]; see also, People ex rel. Falaq v Dalsheim, 122 AD2d 93; cf., Matter of Brevorka ex rel. Wittle v Schuse, 227 AD2d 969). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated February 9, 1995, which transferred the proceeding to the Family Court, Queens County.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The present appeal is not authorized by the governing statute (see, CPLR 7011; People ex rel. Tatra v McNeill, 19 AD2d 845). In a habeas corpus proceeding, no appeal lies from an intermediate order (see, Matter of Wilkes v Wilkes, 212 AD2d 719 [and cases cited therein]; see also, People ex rel. Falaq v Dalsheim, 122 AD2d 93; cf., Matter of Brevorka ex rel. Wittle v Schuse, 227 AD2d 969). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D.2d 294, 654 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olu-s-v-new-york-city-commissioner-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack