Olsovsky v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Olsovsky v. State

67 S.W.2d 1117, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 836

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 10, 1934

DocketNo. 16446

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.W.2d 1117 (Olsovsky v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olsovsky v. State, 67 S.W.2d 1117, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 836 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is embezzlement; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The appellant entered a plea of guilty and waived the right of trial by a jury. The' evidence heard in the trial court is not brought up for review. Nothing in the record has been pointed out or perceived which would justify interference with the judgment It is' therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is embezzlement; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The appellant entered a plea of guilty and waived the right of trial by a jury. The' evidence heard in the trial court is not brought up for review. Nothing in the record has been pointed out or perceived which would justify interference with the judgment It is' therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.W.2d 1117, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olsovsky-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.