Olson v. Taylor

Fourth Circuit

Olson v. Taylor

478 F. App'x 765

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2012·No. No. 12-7056·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Helmar Christopher Olson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint, denying his motion to reconsider, and denying his motion to transfer venue. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Olson v. Taylor, No. 1:11-cv-00160-RJC, 2012 WL 1898908 (W.D.N.C. May 24 & June 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Helmar Christopher Olson appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint, denying his motion to reconsider, and denying his motion to transfer venue. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Olson v. Taylor, No. 1:11-cv-00160-RJC, 2012 WL 1898908 (W.D.N.C. May 24 & June 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Olson v. Taylor, 478 F. App'x 765 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 765 (Olson v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related