Olson v. State
This text of 687 So. 2d 71 (Olson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John Olson appeals from sentences entered following the revocation of Ms probation and sentencing on the underlying charge and subsequent conviction on a separate charge. As entered, these sentences are to run consecutively; however, the written plea agreement contemplates concurrent sentences. TMs case is remanded with directions to either sentence the defendant in accordance with the written agreement or allow him the opportumty to withdraw Ms plea. Kirkman v. State, 559 So.2d 695 (Fla. 3d DCA)(sentence vacated and remanded when the trial court imposed a sentence other than that contemplated in the written plea agreement without explicitly giving the defendant the opportumty to withdraw the plea), review denied, 574 So.2d 143 (Fla.1990).
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
687 So. 2d 71, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 415, 1997 WL 43646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olson-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.