Olson v. Social Security Administration
This text of 709 F. App'x 398 (Olson v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kevin Olson challenges the district court’s 1 dismissal of his complaint challenging the constitutionality of provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, and the Self-Employment Contributions Act.
After careful review, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Butler v. Bank of Am., N.A., 690 F.3d 959, 961 (8th Cir. 2012) (de novo review of dismissal of complaint for failure to state claim). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Appellee’s motions to strike are granted, and Olson’s motion to take judicial notice is denied.
. The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, then United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, now United States Circuit Judge; adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of North Dakota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olson-v-social-security-administration-ca8-2017.