Home/Supreme Court of Delaware/Olson v. Nichols

Olson v. Nichols

976 A.2d 172, 2009 WL 2007197
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 13, 2009
Docket166, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 976 A.2d 172 (Olson v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olson v. Nichols, 976 A.2d 172, 2009 WL 2007197 (Del. 2009).

Opinion

KATIE D. OLSON, Respondent Below, Appellant,
v.
DAMIEN NICHOLS, JR., Petitioner Below, Appellee.

No. 166, 2009.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

July 13, 2009.

ORDER

HENRY DuPONT RIDGELY, Justice

This 13th day of July 2009, it appears to the Court that, on May 29, 2009, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute her appeal by not paying the necessary fees and transcript costs. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
976 A.2d 172, 2009 WL 2007197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olson-v-nichols-del-2009.