Olson v. McLoon
This text of 105 A. 401 (Olson v. McLoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case comes before us upon exceptions and motion for new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. The verdict was for the plaintiff. The defendant waives exceptions and relies upon the motion. After a careful examination of the new evidence, which is that of one person, who was a boy only fourteen years old when the occurrence arose upon which this action was founded, and comparing that evidence with the entire record of evidence at the original trial, we are not persuaded that this new evidence ought to, or would, change the result. Neither are we persuaded ‘that this evidence could not have been discovered by due diligence before the original trial. Motion overruled;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 A. 401, 118 Me. 480, 1919 Me. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olson-v-mcloon-me-1919.