Olson v. Jones
This text of 44 F. App'x 862 (Olson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kimberly R. Olson appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for the defendant in her diversity action alleging conversion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Olson failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Jones stole or damaged her property. See id.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F. App'x 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olson-v-jones-ca9-2002.