Olson v. Cunningham

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Olson v. Cunningham

228 N.W. 895, 200 Wis. 610, 1930 Wisc. LEXIS 48

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 4, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by56 cases

This text of 228 N.W. 895 (Olson v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olson v. Cunningham, 228 N.W. 895, 200 Wis. 610, 1930 Wisc. LEXIS 48 (Wis. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Owen, J.

The Justices participating in the consideration of this case are equally divided, Mr. Chief Justice Rosen-berry, Mr. Justice Stevens, and Mr. Justice Fritz being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Crownhart, Mr. Justice Fowler, and the writer are of the opinion that it should be affirmed. Under .the well established rule, the judgment must be affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owen, J.

The Justices participating in the consideration of this case are equally divided, Mr. Chief Justice Rosen-berry, Mr. Justice Stevens, and Mr. Justice Fritz being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Crownhart, Mr. Justice Fowler, and the writer are of the opinion that it should be affirmed. Under .the well established rule, the judgment must be affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 N.W. 895, 200 Wis. 610, 1930 Wisc. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olson-v-cunningham-wis-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack