Olson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Olson v. City of New York

257 A.D.2d 653, 682 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 257 A.D.2d 653 (Olson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olson v. City of New York, 257 A.D.2d 653, 682 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., nonparty Barasch & McGarry, P. C., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated December 18, 1997, which fixed its share of the attorney’s fee at only $32,853.03 out of a total attorney’s fee of $82,132.57.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court arrived at an apportionment of the attorney’s fee in this action after conducting a hearing at which it had ample opportunity to evaluate the evidence and assess the credibility of the witnesses, as well as to consider the experience and background of counsel and the quantity, quality, and effectiveness of the legal work performed (see, Cody v O’Neill, 116 AD2d 616). We find no basis upon which to conclude that the sum awarded to the appellant constituted other than fair and reasonable compensation (see, Cody v O’Neill, supra). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., nonparty Barasch & McGarry, P. C., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated December 18, 1997, which fixed its share of the attorney’s fee at only $32,853.03 out of a total attorney’s fee of $82,132.57.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court arrived at an apportionment of the attorney’s fee in this action after conducting a hearing at which it had ample opportunity to evaluate the evidence and assess the credibility of the witnesses, as well as to consider the experience and background of counsel and the quantity, quality, and effectiveness of the legal work performed (see, Cody v O’Neill, 116 AD2d 616). We find no basis upon which to conclude that the sum awarded to the appellant constituted other than fair and reasonable compensation (see, Cody v O’Neill, supra). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D.2d 653, 682 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olson-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack