Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.

740 A.2d 864, 251 Conn. 917, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 399, 1999 WL 1053283
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 2, 1999·No. SC 16218·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 506 (AC 18324), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly had determined that certain communications between [918] counsel for the named defendant and an expert consulting firm retained by the named defendant were covered by the attorney-client privilege?”
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16218. Michael N. LaVelle and Alan I. Scheer, in support of the petition. Glenn A. Duhl, Richard D. O’Connor, Edward F. O’Donnell and George J. Kelly, Jr., in opposition. Decided November 2, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp., 740 A.2d 864, 251 Conn. 917, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 399, 1999 WL 1053283 (Colo. 1999).

740 A.2d 864 (Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.
757 A.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)