Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Olsen v. State

Olsen v. State

308 S.E.2d 703, 168 Ga. App. 296, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2756
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 4, 1983
Docket66752
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 308 S.E.2d 703 (Olsen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olsen v. State, 308 S.E.2d 703, 168 Ga. App. 296, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2756 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Appellant was tried and convicted of driving under the influence. He enumerates three errors on appeal. Held:

1. Despite appellant’s persuasive argument to the contrary, we do not agree that the presumptions created by OCGA § 40-6-392 (Code Ann. § 68A-902.1) constitute a denial of due process and equal protection by being burden shifting where those “presumptions” are modified in the charge to the jury as, in reality, being only “rebuttable presumptions or inferences.” See McCann v. State, 167 Ga. App. 368 (306 SE2d 681) (1983).

*297 Decided October 4, 1983. Howard T. Scott, for appellant. Ken Stula, Solicitor, for appellee.

2. For the same reasons stated in Division 1, we also reject appellant’s contention in his second enumeration, which challenges the trial court’s charge on the presumptions delineated in OCGA § 40-6-392 (Code Ann. § 68A-902.1). Id. Although the charge in this case noted that the presumptions were rebuttable and does pass constitutional muster, we believe that the charge quoted in McCann, supra (2), when used in connection with the instructions on the statutory presumptions, provides the jury with a clearer understanding of the legal impact of presumptions. The quoted portion of the McCann charge should always be given by trial courts when instructing on OCGA § 40-6-392 (Code Ann. § 68A-902.1).

3. We have reviewed the remainder of the trial court’s opening and closing instructions to the jury and find no reversible error therein.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Self-Insurers Guaranty Trust Fund v. Thomas
501 S.E.2d 818 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
Rylee v. State
361 S.E.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Simon v. State
355 S.E.2d 120 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Hudgins v. State
337 S.E.2d 378 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Stewart v. State
335 S.E.2d 603 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Melton v. State
333 S.E.2d 682 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Peters v. State
333 S.E.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Riley v. State
330 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Brown v. State
330 S.E.2d 408 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Horah v. State
325 S.E.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Thurman v. State
321 S.E.2d 780 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Clark v. State
313 S.E.2d 748 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 S.E.2d 703, 168 Ga. App. 296, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olsen-v-state-gactapp-1983.