Olsen v. Mason

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Olsen v. Mason

682 So. 2d 1240, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12432, 1996 WL 673313

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1996·No. No. 96-0195·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge the findings of fact made by the trial court, yet they have failed to provide this court with either a transcript of the trial proceedings or a settlement agreement approved by the trial court pursuant to Rule 9.200 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. As a result, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). See also Walt v. Walt, 596 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Boylan v. Boylan, 571 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., and TOMBRINK, R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge the findings of fact made by the trial court, yet they have failed to provide this court with either a transcript of the trial proceedings or a settlement agreement approved by the trial court pursuant to Rule 9.200 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. As a result, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). See also Walt v. Walt, 596 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Boylan v. Boylan, 571 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., and TOMBRINK, R., Associate Judge, concur.

Olsen v. Mason, 682 So. 2d 1240, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12432, 1996 WL 673313 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

682 So. 2d 1240 (Olsen v. Mason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related