Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Olsen v. Mason

Olsen v. Mason

682 So. 2d 1240, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12432, 1996 WL 673313
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 22, 1996
DocketNo. 96-0195
StatusPublished

This text of 682 So. 2d 1240 (Olsen v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olsen v. Mason, 682 So. 2d 1240, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12432, 1996 WL 673313 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge the findings of fact made by the trial court, yet they have failed to provide this court with either a transcript of the trial proceedings or a settlement agreement approved by the trial court pursuant to Rule 9.200 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. As a result, we have no alternative but to affirm the final judgment. Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). See also Walt v. Walt, 596 So.2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Boylan v. Boylan, 571 So.2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., and TOMBRINK, R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Wright
431 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Boylan v. Boylan
571 So. 2d 580 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Walt v. Walt
596 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
682 So. 2d 1240, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12432, 1996 WL 673313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olsen-v-mason-fladistctapp-1996.