Olsen v. Mahoney

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Olsen v. Mahoney

96 N.Y.S. 196

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 24, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denials of the plaintiff’s evidence are so explicit and its contradiction so circumstantial as to impress a person knowing the case only by perusal of the trial minutes with a preponderance in favor of the defendant; but the manner of the witnesses in testifying and their appearance may have been such as to justify the learned trial justice in his finding and judgment, which will not be disturbed here.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The denials of the plaintiff’s evidence are so explicit and its contradiction so circumstantial as to impress a person knowing the case only by perusal of the trial minutes with a preponderance in favor of the defendant; but the manner of the witnesses in testifying and their appearance may have been such as to justify the learned trial justice in his finding and judgment, which will not be disturbed here.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Olsen v. Mahoney, 96 N.Y.S. 196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

96 N.Y.S. 196 (Olsen v. Mahoney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.