Olsen v. Gordon
This text of 125 P.2d 413 (Olsen v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the verdict of a jury and judgment thereon in a will contest, holding John H. Gordon incompetent to [524]*524execute the will and revoking letters testamentary thereto fore issued. But one question is presented on this appeal: Are the verdict and judgment sustained by the evidence? No useful purpose would be subserved by setting forth the testimony of the various witnesses. We have read the record carefully. The evidence is in conflict, but the jury could well have come to the conclusion it did. It is not for us to weigh the evidence and substitute our judgment for that of the jury and trial court.
The judgment is affirmed. Costs to respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 P.2d 413, 101 Utah 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olsen-v-gordon-utah-1942.