Olsen v. Fennia Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Olsen v. Fennia Realty Co.

218 A.D. 863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 A.D. 863 (Olsen v. Fennia Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olsen v. Fennia Realty Co., 218 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Manning and Tfoung, JJ., concur; Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse, upon the ground that the infant plaintiff was a trespasser, and has no cause of action unless one is created by reason of a violation of the ordinances, which, in their opinion, have no application here; and that the ordinances were designed for the protection of pedestrians on the sidewalks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Manning and Tfoung, JJ., concur; Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse, upon the ground that the infant plaintiff was a trespasser, and has no cause of action unless one is created by reason of a violation of the ordinances, which, in their opinion, have no application here; and that the ordinances were designed for the protection of pedestrians on the sidewalks.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olsen-v-fennia-realty-co-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack