Olsen v. Dalzellido, Inc.
This text of 23 F.R.D. 186 (Olsen v. Dalzellido, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I decline to sign the annexed ex parte order sought by the plaintiff for leave to serve interrogatories upon the defendant within ten days after the commencement of the within action.
Rule 33 should be read in conjunction with Rule 26. 4 Moore’s Fed. Prac. (2d ed.) 2273.
I adopt the reasoning advanced in 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac. (2d ed.) 1048, that special reason to obtain leave should be shown. The plaintiff’s condition immediately after his mishap is not uncommon in cases of this kind and does not constistute justification for granting the relief sought herein.
However, this disposition is without prejudice to an application for the same relief on notice. F.R.Civ.P. 33, 28 U.S. C.A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F.R.D. 186, 2 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 478, 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olsen-v-dalzellido-inc-nysd-1959.