Olsen v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Olsen v. City of New York

30 A.D.2d 812, 293 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3524

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 812 (Olsen v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olsen v. City of New York, 30 A.D.2d 812, 293 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 14, 1967, which set aside a jury verdict in his favor on the issue of liability, as against the weight of the credible evidence, and ordered a new trial. Order affirmed, without costs (cf. General Exch. Ins. Corp. v. New York City Tr. Auth., 20 Misc 2d 2). We are of the opinion that the verdict, particularly as it imported findings in plaintiff’s favor on the issues of contributory negligence and constructive notice, was clearly against the weight of the credible evidence. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 14, 1967, which set aside a jury verdict in his favor on the issue of liability, as against the weight of the credible evidence, and ordered a new trial. Order affirmed, without costs (cf. General Exch. Ins. Corp. v. New York City Tr. Auth., 20 Misc 2d 2). We are of the opinion that the verdict, particularly as it imported findings in plaintiff’s favor on the issues of contributory negligence and constructive notice, was clearly against the weight of the credible evidence. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 812, 293 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olsen-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack