O'Loughlin v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail.
50 N.E. 1119, 156 N.Y. 662, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 755
This text of 50 N.E. 1119 (O'Loughlin v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
O'Loughlin v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail., 50 N.E. 1119, 156 N.Y. 662, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 755 (N.Y. 1898).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except GRAY, J., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 N.E. 1119, 156 N.Y. 662, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oloughlin-v-new-york-central-and-hudson-river-rail-ny-1898.