O'Loughlin v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail.
50 N.E. 1119, 156 N.Y. 662, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 755
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except GRAY, J., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Loughlin v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail., 50 N.E. 1119, 156 N.Y. 662, 1898 N.Y. LEXIS 755 (N.Y. 1898).
50 N.E. 1119 (O'Loughlin v. New York Central and Hudson River Rail.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.