Olney v. Bacon

New York Supreme Court

Olney v. Bacon

3 Cai. Cas. 132, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 474

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1805

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 132 (Olney v. Bacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olney v. Bacon, 3 Cai. Cas. 132, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 474 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

The stipulation- was- defective, for the object of the plaintiff could not have been obtained by it; nor does it state to have been made with a view of superseding the necessity of an application- to- the court.- But the order to stay proceedings, having in fact expired before the default for not assigning errors was entered, the defendant [133]*133Was regular; though, as there has been some misapprehension, and a delay from accident, it must be set aside on pay-mentor costs and assigning errors in twenty days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

The stipulation- was- defective, for the object of the plaintiff could not have been obtained by it; nor does it state to have been made with a view of superseding the necessity of an application- to- the court.- But the order to stay proceedings, having in fact expired before the default for not assigning errors was entered, the defendant [133]*133Was regular; though, as there has been some misapprehension, and a delay from accident, it must be set aside on pay-mentor costs and assigning errors in twenty days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cai. Cas. 132, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olney-v-bacon-nysupct-1805.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack