Olmstead v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Olmstead v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.

121 S.E. 687, 157 Ga. 669, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 225

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 27, 1924·No. No. 3760·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals in this ease having been published (30 Ga. App. 126, 117 S. E. 255), it is unnecessary to set forth the question decided by that court, arising under the facts contained in the record. After carefully considering the entire record, this court is of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the Coitrt of Appeals is in accord with the established doctrine in this btate. Cunningham v. Cureton, 96 Ga. 489 (23 S. E. 420), and authorities there cited.

Judgment aifirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals in this ease having been published (30 Ga. App. 126, 117 S. E. 255), it is unnecessary to set forth the question decided by that court, arising under the facts contained in the record. After carefully considering the entire record, this court is of the opinion that the judgment rendered by the Coitrt of Appeals is in accord with the established doctrine in this btate. Cunningham v. Cureton, 96 Ga. 489 (23 S. E. 420), and authorities there cited.

Judgment aifirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., dissenting.

Olmstead v. Carolina Portland Cement Co., 121 S.E. 687, 157 Ga. 669, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 225 (Ga. 1924).

Pincite

121 S.E. 687 (Olmstead v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related