Olmosperez v. Evans

42 N.E.3d 1205, 26 N.Y.3d 1014, 21 N.Y.S.3d 686
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2015·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Linares v Evans, 26 NY3d 1012 [2015] [decided today]; Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, Rivera, AbdusSalaam and Fahey concur; Judge Stein taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Olmosperez v. Evans, 42 N.E.3d 1205, 26 N.Y.3d 1014, 21 N.Y.S.3d 686 (N.Y. 2015).

42 N.E.3d 1205 (Olmosperez v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mullins v. New York State Board of Parole
136 A.D.3d 1141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Huntley v. Stanford
134 A.D.3d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)