Ollins v. State
This text of 654 So. 2d 1278 (Ollins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, James Allen Ollins, appeals multiple judgments and sentences. In cases CF 93-2215, CF 93-1723, CF 91-0359, CF 91-0836, CF 91-5932 and CF 91-2922, we modify probation conditions three and five. We affirm the portion of condition three which prohibits possessing, carrying or owning a firearm and strike the remainder of the condition. Fitts v. State, 649 So.2d 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We strike the first sentence of condition five and affirm the second sentence. Emond v. State, 652 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA March 15, 1995). In all other respects, the defendant’s judgments and sentences are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
654 So. 2d 1278, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409, 1995 WL 302310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ollins-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.