Ollins v. State

654 So. 2d 1278, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409, 1995 WL 302310
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 1995·No. No. 94-01372·Published

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant, James Allen Ollins, appeals multiple judgments and sentences. In cases CF 93-2215, CF 93-1723, CF 91-0359, CF 91-0836, CF 91-5932 and CF 91-2922, we modify probation conditions three and five. We affirm the portion of condition three which prohibits possessing, carrying or owning a firearm and strike the remainder of the condition. Fitts v. State, 649 So.2d 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Tomlinson v. State, 645 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We strike the first sentence of condition five and affirm the second sentence. Emond v. State, 652 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA March 15, 1995). In all other respects, the defendant’s judgments and sentences are affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ollins v. State, 654 So. 2d 1278, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5409, 1995 WL 302310 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

654 So. 2d 1278 (Ollins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emond v. State
652 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Tomlinson v. State
645 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Fitts v. State
649 So. 2d 300 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)