Ollikkala v. Rsi, Inc.

777 N.W.2d 238, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 49, 2010 WL 376275
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 29, 2010·No. A09-1638·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 11, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ollikkala v. Rsi, Inc., 777 N.W.2d 238, 2010 Minn. LEXIS 49, 2010 WL 376275 (Mich. 2010).

777 N.W.2d 238 (Ollikkala v. Rsi, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)