Olliff v. Hartley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Olliff v. Hartley

116 S.E. 351, 29 Ga. App. 771, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 187

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 27, 1923

Docket13256

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 351 (Olliff v. Hartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olliff v. Hartley, 116 S.E. 351, 29 Ga. App. 771, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

There being evidence to authorize the inference that the defendant contracted with the plaintiff to buy the latter’s interest in an option, which both had, to purchase certain real estate, and that the defendant had failed to perform his contract, the verdict rendered against the defendant in a suit for breach of the contract was authorized.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

There being evidence to authorize the inference that the defendant contracted with the plaintiff to buy the latter’s interest in an option, which both had, to purchase certain real estate, and that the defendant had failed to perform his contract, the verdict rendered against the defendant in a suit for breach of the contract was authorized.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., coneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E. 351, 29 Ga. App. 771, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olliff-v-hartley-gactapp-1923.