Ollie Warren v. United States
This text of 348 F.2d 166 (Ollie Warren v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ollie Warren, having been convicted and sentenced in federal court on his plea of guilty of the offense of breaking or attempting to break into a post office in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2115 (1958), applied to the district court, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1958), for release from custody. The district court denied the application without granting Warren a hearing. Warren appeals, asserting that the district court erred in not granting him a hearing.
This is the second time Warren has appealed to this court from a district court order denying an application under section 2255. On the previous appeal we affirmed. Warren v. Richardson, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 781.
In his new application, Warren makes allegations not included in his first application. Viewing these allegations as a whole, we think they are of such nature that Warren should have been accorded an evidentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
348 F.2d 166, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ollie-warren-v-united-states-ca9-1965.