Oller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Oller v. State

350 So. 2d 364, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16480

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 1977·No. No. 77-356·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The judgment and sentence, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The judgment and sentence, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.

Oller v. State, 350 So. 2d 364, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16480 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

350 So. 2d 364 (Oller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related