Olivier v. City of Fall River

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Olivier v. City of Fall River

28 N.E.2d 228, 306 Mass. 376, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 908

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJune 26, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 28 N.E.2d 228 (Olivier v. City of Fall River) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Olivier v. City of Fall River, 28 N.E.2d 228, 306 Mass. 376, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 908 (Mass. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Lummus, J.

This is a petition by ten taxable inhabitants of the respondent city under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 40, [377]*377§ 53, to prevent the payment to one Mooney of a pension after his retirement from the service of the city. Mooney had been employed as a laborer for thirty-six years when in June, 1932, at the age of sixty-four, he suffered injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. Under the workmen’s compensation act he was awarded compensation for two hundred sixty-eight weeks at the rate of $16.80 a week, which he has received. At the time of his injury he was entitled, under St. 1924, c. 278, as amended by St. 1930, c. 71, because of his age, length of service, and incapacity, to apply for retirement upon an annual pension amounting to half pay with a maximum of $500. He elected not to apply for retirement, and became separated from the service of the city because of his incapacity. Fernandez v. Mayor of New Bedford, 269 Mass. 445. Horrigan v. Mayor of Pittsfield, 298 Mass. 492. By St. 1939, c. 95, the Legislature ordered his reinstatement for the sole purpose of being retired on half pay. He was so reinstated and retired on January 4, 1940.

The principle upon which pensions to civil officers and employees are sustained against attack on constitutional grounds, that they tend to make the public service attractive, efficient and honorable, applies as well to pensions presently granted to selected and named individuals for past services, as to pensions granted to a present or future class by general legislation. Opinion of the Justices, 175 Mass. 599. Opinion of the Justices, 211 Mass. 608. Opinion of the Justices, 240 Mass. 616. Gray v. Salem, 271 Mass. 495, 498. Goodale v. County Commissioners, 277 Mass. 144. Horrigan v. Mayor of Pittsfield, 298 Mass. 492. The provision in G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, § 73 (St. 1937, c. 336, § 23), that an employee of a city must elect between workmen’s compensation and a pension, could not deprive the Legislature of its power after the election had been made to recognize long and faithful service at an earlier time by a pension in contravention of the policy of that statute. Horrigan v. Mayor of Pittsfield, 298 Mass. 492. The petition was rightly dismissed.

Decree affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lummus, J.

This is a petition by ten taxable inhabitants of the respondent city under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 40, [377]*377§ 53, to prevent the payment to one Mooney of a pension after his retirement from the service of the city. Mooney had been employed as a laborer for thirty-six years when in June, 1932, at the age of sixty-four, he suffered injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. Under the workmen’s compensation act he was awarded compensation for two hundred sixty-eight weeks at the rate of $16.80 a week, which he has received. At the time of his injury he was entitled, under St. 1924, c. 278, as amended by St. 1930, c. 71, because of his age, length of service, and incapacity, to apply for retirement upon an annual pension amounting to half pay with a maximum of $500. He elected not to apply for retirement, and became separated from the service of the city because of his incapacity. Fernandez v. Mayor of New Bedford, 269 Mass. 445. Horrigan v. Mayor of Pittsfield, 298 Mass. 492. By St. 1939, c. 95, the Legislature ordered his reinstatement for the sole purpose of being retired on half pay. He was so reinstated and retired on January 4, 1940.

The principle upon which pensions to civil officers and employees are sustained against attack on constitutional grounds, that they tend to make the public service attractive, efficient and honorable, applies as well to pensions presently granted to selected and named individuals for past services, as to pensions granted to a present or future class by general legislation. Opinion of the Justices, 175 Mass. 599. Opinion of the Justices, 211 Mass. 608. Opinion of the Justices, 240 Mass. 616. Gray v. Salem, 271 Mass. 495, 498. Goodale v. County Commissioners, 277 Mass. 144. Horrigan v. Mayor of Pittsfield, 298 Mass. 492. The provision in G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152, § 73 (St. 1937, c. 336, § 23), that an employee of a city must elect between workmen’s compensation and a pension, could not deprive the Legislature of its power after the election had been made to recognize long and faithful service at an earlier time by a pension in contravention of the policy of that statute. Horrigan v. Mayor of Pittsfield, 298 Mass. 492. The petition was rightly dismissed.

Decree affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.E.2d 228, 306 Mass. 376, 1940 Mass. LEXIS 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olivier-v-city-of-fall-river-mass-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack