Olivero v. Grandway Discount Center

183 So. 2d 542
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 16, 1966
DocketNo. 34797
StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 542 (Olivero v. Grandway Discount Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Olivero v. Grandway Discount Center, 183 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 27, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for writ of certiorari and the petition for attorney’s fees are both denied.

THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 2d 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/olivero-v-grandway-discount-center-fla-1966.