Oliveras v. Arzuaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Oliveras v. Arzuaga

209 A.D.2d 298, 619 N.Y.S.2d 538

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 298 (Oliveras v. Arzuaga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oliveras v. Arzuaga, 209 A.D.2d 298, 619 N.Y.S.2d 538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered March 3, 1994, which dismissed the within child custody petition, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law §§ 75-d and 75-h, Family Court dismissed the custody petition on the ground that Maryland was a more convenient forum since the respondent and the child were living there since October of 1993. Since a consent order was subsequently entered into in the Circuit Court of Maryland in this matter, the appeal is moot. Were we to reach the merits, we would affirm (Matter of Heitler v Hoosin, 143 AD2d 1018). Concur—Asch, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered March 3, 1994, which dismissed the within child custody petition, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law §§ 75-d and 75-h, Family Court dismissed the custody petition on the ground that Maryland was a more convenient forum since the respondent and the child were living there since October of 1993. Since a consent order was subsequently entered into in the Circuit Court of Maryland in this matter, the appeal is moot. Were we to reach the merits, we would affirm (Matter of Heitler v Hoosin, 143 AD2d 1018). Concur—Asch, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 298, 619 N.Y.S.2d 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliveras-v-arzuaga-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack