Oliver Williams, Inc. v. Nielsen

206 Misc. 172, 131 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1954 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3364
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 13, 1954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The undisputed facts are that buyer and seller merely agreed as to price and down payment in this real estate transaction, but the amount, interest and amortization rate, and term of the mortgages covering the balance thereof were not even discussed at the time of defendant’s repudiation. Plaintiff may not recover agreed brokerage commissions on the theory of performance of its contract, in view of such essential terms of the sale having been left for future negotiation by the parties. There was no such meeting of the minds on all the necessary terms as is required to constitute a sale consummated by the broker’s efforts. Accordingly the complaint should have been dismissed.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Hammer, Hopstadteb and Edeb, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver Williams, Inc. v. Nielsen, 206 Misc. 172, 131 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1954 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

206 Misc. 172 (Oliver Williams, Inc. v. Nielsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. Shmulevitz
12 Misc. 2d 568 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1958)