Oliver Vernon v. State
Opinion
Order entered February 7, 2020
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00754-CR
OLIVER VERNON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-34899-Y
ORDER Appellant’s brief is over thirty days past due. We ORDER the trial court to conduct a
hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall
make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to
prosecute this appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel
has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain
appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s
absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per
curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be
necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Chika Anyiam,
Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; to Valencia Bush; and to the Dallas County
District Attorney’s Office.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oliver Vernon v. State (Oliver Vernon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.